Port n Polish Factory Manifold for DCVR
#3
Posted 28 March 2011 - 8:01 PM
#4
Posted 28 March 2011 - 9:18 PM
#5
Posted 30 March 2011 - 6:33 PM
Its actually the same diameter as the factory turbo gasket, Steve's already built my turbo for me which has those "tricks" done to the exhaust housing, so it'll be a nice smooth transition from the uppipe to the turbo.
I'm also getting a custom cross pipe made once my engines built, so everything will end up port matched from the heads through to the turbo.
p.s Steve, if your reading this and trying to figure out who I am, its Chris from Welli (VF36 P20 and a BIG compressor wheel) , Andy's mate. btw Nice work on Johnny's turbo I was watching them try to squueze it in on saturday.
#6
Posted 30 March 2011 - 6:53 PM
#7
Posted 30 March 2011 - 8:24 PM
#8
Posted 31 March 2011 - 4:07 AM
MSETURBOS, on 30 March 2011 - 8:24 PM, said:
Will be interesting, he was certianly suprised with andys when he reflashed it.
Boostin: My engines not built yet, off the road for 2 years now
Dont believe everything you read on the forums about up pipe size. I'm sure Trust couldn't get away with charging $200+ for an up pipe if it made the performance worse, these japanese companies put a huge amount of time/money into R&D.
If I was using a standard unported turbo there wouldn't be much point in an uppipe with a bigger diameter than the turbo inlet.
As for the lack of flexi, I doubt it'll crack as its made of very thick stainless and has about 12mm thick flanges. I'm convinced that the need for less turbulance outweighs the need for a flexi.
I will however have a flexi in my new crosspipe to deal with heat expansion of the engine
Heres a before and after of some of my porting
#9
Posted 31 March 2011 - 4:50 PM
When I find my manifolds in the black hole (aka garage - everything that goes into it disappears), I'll take some pics too. So far I've spent about 2 hours on them, porting them and removing heat shield mounting tags.
#10
Posted 31 March 2011 - 4:55 PM
All the porting you guys are doing is very much a good thing the main thing that hurts responce is pipe size
#11
Posted 31 March 2011 - 5:17 PM
#12
Posted 31 March 2011 - 5:44 PM
boostin, on 31 March 2011 - 5:17 PM, said:
wouldnt trust him hes a dodgy bastard
#13
Posted 31 March 2011 - 8:07 PM
But the name escapes me. Read a great article about it in Street Machine coupla years ago. Maybe flick them an email?
#14
Posted 01 April 2011 - 3:57 PM
Familyman, on 31 March 2011 - 8:07 PM, said:
But the name escapes me. Read a great article about it in Street Machine coupla years ago. Maybe flick them an email?
Specialised Power Porting.
#15
Posted 03 April 2011 - 9:06 AM
#16
Posted 03 April 2011 - 9:33 AM
Stoffa, on 03 April 2011 - 9:06 AM, said:
A bit of turbulence in the intake is good though. It helps with swirl and tumble into the cylinder and assists combustion.
#17
Posted 03 April 2011 - 6:40 PM
#18
Posted 06 April 2011 - 10:13 PM
[/quote]
hay chris has johnny said how his car drives? andy said 241kw wheel on 20 psi and the map sensor wasnt happy?
with the intake cam change it should put him over 260kw, but since its one of them crap turbo upgrades i do that afew uneducated keyboard knob clubsub dorks go on about then i guess it works not to bad or as they say you can get 290kw from a vf22
i should email that post to IHI theyll enjoy that one,opps my bad did i say all that out loud?
Heres an idea i came up with ( doesnt happen too often ) have a sub drag day with a differance using a veracom do flying runs between 60-120kph weigh each car and use the time to work out the power,with the numbers those speacial clubsub people qoute we should see some weapons!!! ill pay to come watch
sorry guys i get somewhat pissed with idiots that mislead others and all they have to show is a dyno sheet,the black top tells all.
#19
Posted 07 April 2011 - 5:33 AM
#20
Posted 08 April 2011 - 5:57 PM
[/quote]
so a smooth inside for the intake isnt going to give any gains?
Help











